I'm stuttering in October's film-review-repeat rhythm, so even though I have technically written about this movie before (I saw it way back during its initial release) I still wanted to jot down a few things that I didn't mention previously, to grease the review wheels, if you will.
Ted Raimi is in this... He's not only in it, he's killed in it - and his eyes pop out!
Back in '08 I said one bad CGI moment stuck out, but the rest was sound. Obviously nearly ten years on the CGI splatter appears less seamless, but the gore (a nice mix of computer generated and practical) remains solid and startling.
It's not relentless, but when it does come it comes HARD. Eye violence; tooth violence; fingernail violence... check!
Some people be hating on the title of this film, but I think it's perfect. Why, particularly in a genre like this, do we always have to be subtle? And if creator Clive Barker himself thought it was good enough, then who are we to argue.
I find something really comforting about the thought of old gods/beings ruling a city without our knowledge. Is that weird?